Category: Judiciary

  • ASUU strike: Court adjourns case till September 16

    ASUU strike: Court adjourns case till September 16

    The case between the Federal Government and the Academic Staff Union of Universities, ASUU, has been adjourned to September 16 by the National Industrial Court.

    Justice Polycap Hamman adjourned the matter to enable both parties to file the necessary papers for the suit.

    The Head of Press and Public Relations at the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Olajide Oshundun, revealed that the matter was referred to the Registrar of the National Industrial Court by the Minister of Labour and Productivity, Chris Ngige, after which the government approached the court, requesting an order allowing ASUU to resume operations while the dispute is being resolved.

    ASUU has been on strike since February of this year, resulting in the closure of public universities for the past eight months.

  • Oyo Judiciary workers begin sit-at- home over July salary delay

    On Tuesday, judicial workers in Oyo State followed the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria’s (JUSUN) sit-at-home directive in protest of the July salary payment delay.

    Mr. Obafunso Okulaja, the Oyo State JUSUN Public Relations Officer, stated that the decision for the strike was made following the union’s congress on Friday.

    Okulaja stated that the workers had not been paid in July, despite the fact that other government agencies in the state had been paid on July 25.
    “Because our members do not have enough money to come to work, we directed them to stay at home.”

    Read Also: We’ll be equitable, just, inclusive if elected – Shettima

    “JUSUN has yet to receive his July salary in the state, and this has been the case since December 2021.”
    “We call on the state government to put us on the priority list as the third arm of the government.

    “If the executive and legislative arms are given priority, the judiciary should also be given same.

    The sit-at-home will continue until we receive our July salary,” he said. Findings revealed that the Iyaganku Magistrates’ Court and State High Court, the entrance gates to court premises and some offices were locked while people and vehicles were restrained from entering.

  • Ex-minister petitions court to disqualify Tinubu, Atiku from office for bribing delegates in 2023

    Ex-minister petitions court to disqualify Tinubu, Atiku from office for bribing delegates in 2023

    A FORMER Chukwuemeka Nwajiuba, Minister of State for Education, has petitioned an Abuja Federal High Court to disqualify All Progressives Congress (APC) and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) presidential candidates Bola Tinubu and Abubakar Atiku from the 2023 general election.

    Nwajiuba, who resigned from his ministerial position to run in the APC presidential primary, also asked the court to declare him the party’s authentic candidate.

    The minister is also pleading for the cancellation of the votes cast for Atiku and Tinubu in the APC and PDP presidential primaries.

    The APC, the PDP, Tinubu, Atiku, the Attorney-General of the Federation, and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) are the six defendants in the case with suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/942/22.

    Nwajiuba, who was one of the APC’s presidential candidates but received only one vote in the June 8 primary despite staying away, accused Tinubu of bribing delegates with dollars.

    Read also: Presidency: It’s time to tell Nigerians the truth – Wike on PDP over Atiku, Okowa

    Specifically, the ex-minister asked the court to rule on whether the composition of the delegates violated Articles 11(A), 12(1), and 13(1) of the APC Constitution.

    The ex-minister also asked the court to rule on whether the composition of the delegates at the PDP primary violated Sections 33(1) and (5) (c) of the party’s Constitution.

    The plaintiffs asked the court to rule on whether, in light of the explicit, unambiguous, and express provisions and tenor of Sections 6(6) (A), (B), and (C) of the 1999 Constitution, the court has the inherent judicial powers to nullify, cancel, and declare illegal the APC and PDP presidential primaries.

    Nwajiuba asked the court to rule on whether all of the votes cast in support of Tinubu and Atiku at the APC and PDP’s special national conventions were illegal, null and void, and had no effect on the grounds of corruption, selling of delegate votes, and voter inducement.

    The former minister, who is seeking 26 reliefs, has asked the court to rule that Atiku and Tinubu, along with their agents, bribed delegates with dollars, and that as a result, the votes they received should be declared illegal.

    Nwajiuba did not attend the party’s presidential primary election at Eagle Square in Abuja after a group paid N100 million for his nomination form.

    The former minister, widely regarded as one of the key South-East candidates, was conspicuously absent from the convention.

    His brother, Chinedu Nwajiuba, explained the development by claiming that top-level party leaders violated an agreement and understanding that informed the former minister’s participation in the presidential project.

  • FG, Germany sign agreement on return of Benin bronzes

    FG, Germany sign agreement on return of Benin bronzes

    Nigeria and Germany signed a joint declaration in Berlin on Friday that will pave the way for the return of 1,130 Benin bronzes to Nigeria, 125 years after they were stolen from the ancient Benin Kingdom during the Benin Expedition of 1897.

    While Nigeria’s Minister of Information and Culture, Lai Mohammed, and Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Zubairu Dada, signed on behalf of the country, Germany’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ms Annalena Baerbock, and Minister of State for Culture and the Media, Ms Claudia Roth, signed on behalf of the country.

    The event was witnessed by top Nigerian and German government officials, including the Nigerian Ambassador to Germany, Yusuf Tuggar, and the Director-General of the National Commission for Museums and Monuments, Prof. Abba Tijani, according to a statement issued by the minister’s Special Assistant (Media), Segun Adeyemi.

    Mohammed thanked Germany’s government and people for the “largest repatriation of artefacts anywhere in the world.”

    “We also want to express our heartfelt gratitude to the authorities of the various German regions, cities, museums, and institutions that have collaborated to ensure the manifestation of this historic event.” “By taking this singular action, Germany has taken the lead in righting past wrongs,” he said.

    Read Also: 2023: Why I don’t regret working for Abacha – Al-Mustaph

    “Germany did not colonise Nigeria and was not involved in the looting of the artefacts,” Mohammed said, adding that many of the Benin bronzes in German public institutions came from trade and donations.

    Nonetheless, Germany and its great people decided that it is better to shape the future by correcting the mistakes of the past. I have no doubt that the Federal Government of Germany’s pioneering action will pave the way for more repatriation of cultural property to its original location, as other museums and institutions are expected to follow Germany’s lead.

    “By returning to Nigeria what rightfully belongs to it, Germany has gained more friends in Nigeria and all over the world,” he said.

    Dada, for one, dubbed Germany the “champion of justice and fairness.”

    Ms Baerbock, Germany’s Foreign Minister, also spoke, saying, “It was wrong to take the (Benin) bronzes. It was a mistake to keep them ( for 125 years). This is the first step toward putting things right.”

    At the signing ceremony, two of the Benin bronzes were handed over to Nigeria as a symbolic gesture of the artefacts’ imminent return.

  • Ex-Permanent Secretary Illoh was sentenced to 12 years in prison, ordered to forfeit N97.3 million, $139,575, and £10,121 to FG

    Ex-Permanent Secretary Illoh was sentenced to 12 years in prison, ordered to forfeit N97.3 million, $139,575, and £10,121 to FG

    Dr Clement Illoh, a former Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Labour and Productivity, was sentenced to 12 years in prison by a Federal High Court in Lagos.

    On each of the three counts involving non-declaration of assets, he was sentenced to four years in prison.

    Illoh was sentenced by presiding Judge Babs Kuewunmi after he changed his “not guilty” plea to “guilty” four years after the prosecution’s case was closed.

    “I have paid close attention to the defendant’s plea. The court, on the other hand, will not fail to carry out its duties in accordance with the law. As a result, the defendant is hereby sentenced to four years in each of the counts, which will begin on October 10, 2019,” Justice Kuewunmi said.

    Read Also:  Buhari says Kanu’s release will be decided by court

    The judge also ordered the Federal Government of Nigeria to forfeit the sums of N97,300,613.44, $139,575.50, and £10,121.52 as proceeds of unlawful activities.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) was investigating Illoh on three counts.
    According to the first count, the defendant failed to make full disclosure of assets worth N97.3 million on April 19, 2016, in Lagos, an offence punishable under Section 27 Subsection 3c of the EFCC Establishment Act of 2004.
    He was charged with failing to disclose assets worth $139,575, and failing to disclose assets worth £10,121 in the third count.

    He reversed his position on Thursday after an EFCC prosecutor revealed that Illoh received funds totaling N65 million from SURE-P project contractors to his personal First Bank account number 3033750243.

    Mr T.S. Awana, the defendant’s lawyer, requested permission from the court to confer with his client in the middle of the proceedings, after which he applied for the defendant to change his plea.

    Read Also:  Evans gets new lawyer in trial for attempted kidnap of Young Shall Grow boss

    Illoh pleaded guilty after Justice Kuewunmi granted his request.

    As a result, he was found guilty and sentenced to four years in prison on each of the four counts.

    Illoh has now been convicted of fraud for the second time in three years.

    On October 3, 2019, Illoh was sentenced to five years in prison by Justice Oluwatoyin Taiwo, who presided over an Ikeja Special Offences Court.

    Federal Government forfeits N94 million, $139,575, and £10,121.52.

  • Ataga: Court Dismisses Objection By Chidinma’s Lawyer To Cross-Examine Access Bank’s Employee

    Ataga: Court Dismisses Objection By Chidinma’s Lawyer To Cross-Examine Access Bank’s Employee

    The counsel for Chidinma Ojukwu’s motion to cross-examine an employee of Access Bank over the late Mr Usifo Ataga’s bank statements tendered as exhibits was dismissed by a Lagos High Court sitting at the Tafawa Balewa Square on Tuesday.

    The bank statements, on the other hand, were admitted as exhibits by Justice Yetunde Adesanya.

    Ojukwu is on trial for the alleged assassination of Super TV’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Ataga.

    Along with her sister, Chioma Egbuchu, and one Adedapo Quadri, she is charged with murder, stealing, and forgery.

    Mrs. A. O. Oluwafemi, the prosecution’s counsel, told the court on Tuesday that the prosecution had a representative from Access Bank in court on the basis of the subpoena to tender the deceased’s account document.

    She then summoned Toafeek Lawal, a bank representative, to the witness box to present the statement and the certificate of identification.

    Following the tender of the statement, the first defendant’s counsel, Onwuka Egwu, raised an objection to the officer from Access Bank being cross-examined about the document he had tendered.

    Read Also:  Police arrested seven suspects, including15-year-old, in connection with Bauchi community disturbance

    Lawal, he claims, is the deceased’s account officer, as evidenced by the subpoena and certification attached to the account.

    As a result, he stated that the bank officer was in a position to testify regarding the account.
    However, neither the second defendant’s counsel, Mr Babatunde Busari, nor the third defendant’s counsel, Mr A. O. Ogunsanya, objected to the account statements being submitted.

    In a brief ruling, Justice Adesanya stated that Section 218 of the Evidence Act (EA) 2011 allows a person, whether a party or not, to be summoned to produce a document without being summoned to testify.
    She also stated that under Section 219 of the EA, a person summoned to produce a document does not become a witness simply by producing it, and that he cannot be cross-examined until he is called as a witness.

    “Because this Access Bank officer has not been sworn under oath, he cannot be cross-examined,” the judge said, dismissing the first defendant’s application.

    Similarly, Ademola Ayodeji, a Guaranty Trust Bank officer, presented the late Ataga’s bank statements to the court.

    As a result, Justice Adesanya accepted all of the documents as exhibits in court.

    According to reports, the prosecution requested a short adjournment from the court on April 25 in order to get its house in order regarding the deceased’s bank statements.

    On October 12, 2021, the three defendants were arraigned on a nine-count charge brought by the Lagos State Government against them (LASG).

    Ojukwu and Quadri are accused of conspiracy, murder, stabbing, forgery, falsifying bank statements, and stealing, among other charges.

    Egbuchu, the third defendant, is charged with stealing an iPhone 7 belonging to the late Ataga.

    Read also:  Kidnapped DELSU student released after payment of N3m ransom

    On June 15, 2021, Ojukwu and Quadri allegedly conspired to murder Ataga by stabbing him several times in the neck and chest with a knife.

    No.19, Adewale Oshin St., Lekki Phase 1, Lagos State, is where the alleged murder occurred.

    The two were also charged with forgery for obtaining and fabricating bank account statements purporting to be signed by the deceased.

    The case has been postponed until April 28 to allow for the continuation of the trial.

  • Supreme Court seals fate of 74 degeristed political parties, the Battle is Finally Lost

    Supreme Court seals fate of 74 degeristed political parties, the Battle is Finally Lost

    The most important use of a political party would be to spur members to contest elections. Apart from contesting the election, political parties canvass different policies and policies for the people as a pressure group. They play a significant part in the decision-making to assist legislation and implementation of policies. These political parties, when effective in elections, form and run the government.

    So, the use of a political party is not limited to winning elections. Be that as it may, Nigeria has witnessed a proliferation of political parties because of the return to democratic rule from the Fourth Republic.

    But in the 2019 general election (20 years later), a record amount of 91 political parties fielded over 23,000 candidates.

    This was absurd and the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Prof. Mahmood Yakubu in explaining the way the decision to delist none doing parties said that the commission reached the decision following the 2019 general election, including court-ordered re-run elections originating from litigations, saying the Commission was able to ascertain the performance of political parties in the elections.

    He added that the political parties were assessed on the basis of the performance in the Area Council elections in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), which coincided with the 2019 overall election to arrive at the choice.

    He rationalized the action, saying, “Prior to the Alteration, the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended) had supplied for deregistration of political parties. According to this provision, the Commission, between 2011 and 2013, deregistered 39 political parties

    As a regulatory body, the 1999 constitution as amended in section 225A empowers INEC to perform its regulatory obligations.

    The department provides that INEC will have the power to deregister a political party for (a) violation of any of the prerequisites for enrollment (b) collapse to win at least 25 per cent of votes cast (I) on condition of the federation in a presidential election or (ii) one local authorities of the country in a governorship election (c) collapse to succeed (I) one ward in the chairmanship election (ii) one seat at the state or national House of Assembly election or (iii) one seat at the councillorship election.

    Together with the actions, only 16 political parties currently exist in the nation according to 92. They are Accord Party (AP), Action Alliance (AA), African American Action Congress (AAC), African Democratic Congress (ADC), African Democratic Party (ADP), All Progressives Congress (APC), All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) and Allied Peoples Movement (APM).

    However, some political parties went to court to challenge the conclusion of INEC to de-register them. There were conflicting conclusions, one in favour of this de-registration and another against the workout. This forced INEC to seek the Supreme Court decision.

    The hopes of those 74 political parties that were deregistered from INEC in February 2020 for failure to win in any competition following the 2019 general election to be re-listed on the ballot box has been permanently dented from the Supreme Court.

    The commission had stated its decision followed a relative review and court-ordered re-run elections originating from litigations on political parties in the past elections.

    It further said the political parties played badly and failed to acquire a minimum of one seat in the last election. INEC also said the parties breached the need for registration of political parties under section 225 of the Nigerian constitution.

    Expectedly, the practice sparked public debate as to whether the electoral umpire has the constitutional power to make such a movement.

    Reacting to the conclusion, the President of the Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC), Dr. Leonard Nzenwa hailed the judgment and said the ruling had stopped all speculations and as it will help INEC to now focus on significant issues in preparation for delivering credible, fair and free 2023 general election.

    He clarified that the ruling of the apex court will help INEC in preparation. He wondered how the commission fared with 23,000 candidates who contested the 2019 entire election.

    Also speaking, the Council of Nigerian Ethnic Youth Leaders called on the National Assembly to quickly amend the Constitution and Electoral Act to stop additional registration of political parties stating the 18 remaining parties ought to be sufficient to satisfy all political tendencies in the nation.

    All Grand Alliance Party (AGAP), Fresh Democratic Party (FDP) and Alliance for Democracy (AD) cried foul and accused the inaugural umpire of illegality.

    In his own part, the KOWA Party, the Abundant Nigeria Renewal Party (ANRP), and the Socialist Party of Nigeria criticized that the ruling wondering why the Supreme Court should stop Nigerians from associating with one another.

    A legal practitioner, Emeka Udeh wondered how the apex court could rule contrary to freedom of association as enshrined in the constitution. He stated that political parties aren’t necessarily meant to win elections but additionally to canvass opinions on policies of the government.

    Though he explained, “since the court pleases, I can not confuse the Supreme Court but I maintain the opinion it is against the spirit of association by people to freely meet and maintain remarks.”

    Taking a stance, the Youths Alliance for Democratic Advancement also supported the conclusion of the Supreme. Court. The organization issued a statement advancing reasons for standing together with an apex court. “The nation’s electioneering process will continue to suffer retrogression with the long list of political parties on the ballot, which constitutes confusion and accounts for a high number of void votes, was allowed to remain.

    The Ekiti State Coordinator of the NGO, Michael Ogungbemi, had said, “the idea that 91 parties engaged in the general election was not great,” adding that registering 91 political parties in a developing nation like Nigeria with a high level of illiteracy would not assist the electoral system.

    “Rather, INEC should register most of these parties for local governments and state houses of assembly elections together with performance benchmarks or criteria that should they score a certain percentage of votes, they’d qualify to participate in the governorship and National Assembly elections and up into the Presidential election.

    “If not assessed and controlled, INEC may register up to 300 political parties until 2023. Apart from these, INEC would not be able to manage this range of political parties in the future,” he added.

    Ahead of the INEC conclusion that was ratified by the apex court, many Nigerians had at different times known as for the whittling down of the number of celebrations in the country.

    Read Also:  Central Bank of Nigeria has disbursed N83.9 billion loans to pharmaceutical companies and healthcare practitioners

    For example, former Senate President in the aborted Third Republic, Chief Ameh Ebute, voiced concerns over the existence of 68 registered political parties at the political terrain, stating they had been unwieldy to the country’s democracy to create any meaningful improvement.

    Ebute had contended that the registration of numerous political parties without firm ideology had been counter-productive to flourishing partisan politics.

    He explained, “About the issue of political parties, it’s my opinion that there is no political ideology for politicians to think about prior to jumping from one party to the other. The only ideology, for the time being, is battling for access to the federal cake so as to have a share of it. I’m needing a two-party system. This will enable politicians to select whether or not a progressive or a conservative.”

    Sulaiman, who served as National Planning Minister under former President Goodluck Jonathan’s government, argued that Nigeria requires just three operational political parties to deepen democratic civilization among the citizenry.

    He said “Some political parties now do not even have offices in various states across the nation, but then they occupy space on the ballot paper, thereby causing confusion. When you speak about the inconclusive election, over-voting, some Nigerians in the rural areas could not differentiate between specific symbols since we have a ballot paper that’s as long as one kilometre.

    What many Nigerians say for now is that the misuse of each process, explaining the Supreme Court judgement was an extreme to curb the misuse by Nigerians. Though, they admitted that there could be additional roles that political parties may play in a democracy.

    In this line of thought, a few Nigerians have called for a stop to additional registration of political parties to enable INEC adequate time for the 2023 general elections.

    An INEC official told that the Supreme Court judgment might not stop the commission from registering more political parties as in the last count there are more than 100 petitions from groups searching for registration as political parties.

    He said, “that the one thing that could prevent INEC from registering more political parties is a legislation and amendment of the constitution, even less the commission will be accused of blocking the governmental space where politicians could ventilate their views when they’re choked.”

    QUOTE

    On his part, the KOWA Party, the Abundant Nigeria Renewal Party (ANRP), along with the Socialist Party of Nigeria criticized that the ruling wondering why the Supreme Court should prevent Nigerians from associating together. A legal practitioner, Emeka Udeh wondered the apex court could rule contrary to freedom of association as enshrined in the constitution. He opened that political parties are not necessarily intended to win elections but additionally to canvass opinions on policies of authorities. Though, he said, “because the court pleases, I can not fault the Supreme Court but I hold the view that it is contrary to the spirit of association by people to publicly meet and hold opinions.

     

  • Lawmaker accuses Governors of frustrating financial independence of legislature, judiciary

    Lawmaker accuses Governors of frustrating financial independence of legislature, judiciary

    The member representing Bosso constituency, Hon. Malik Madaki Bosso has accused the State Governor, Abubakar Sani Bello of frustrating the financial autonomy for the legislative and judicial arms of the state government.

    Bosso who made the allegations in Minna mentioned Nigerian governors had been persistently showing citizens that they’re the modern-day emperors and not democrats.

    The lawmaker stated if governors are allowed to get away with the constitutional breaches, then the future of democracy was not sure.

    “It is a constitutional challenge. It’s in section 121 of the constitution. If that they had anything against the availability, they should have opposed it through the constitutional amendment as a substitute for placing us in this quagmire. If they are going to chose which section of the constitution they’ll respect or not, then we’re heading into anarchy”.

    Malik stated if ordinary citizens can be jailed for breaking local government bye-laws, he doesn’t see why governors should be allowed to stroll free for breaking the supreme laws of the land, which was contained in the constitution.

    Read Also:  Executive, legislative, party consultative forum kicks off meeting

    He mentioned the following amendment that needs to be achieved within the Constitution was to remove immunity for governors.

    “if immunity clause is removed from the Constitution and the judiciary and legislature had been fully granted autonomy and Independence, then the kind of democracy all of us desired will likely be entrenched and the impunity of governors shall be curtailed.”

    He, however, called on the judiciary to get up from slumber to defend and shield the laws of the land, adding that he was totally in help of the industrial actions embarked upon by both the Parliamentary Staff Association of Nigeria (PASAN) and the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN).

  • National Assembly has postponed its resumption till Tuesday, February 9, 2020

    National Assembly has postponed its resumption till Tuesday, February 9, 2020

    The National Assembly has postponed its resumption till Tuesday, February 9, 2020.

    Both Chambers on December 21st, 2020 adjourned plenary till January 26, 2021, to enable members to observe the Christmas and New Year festivities.

    Clerk to the National Assembly, Arc. Ojo Amos disclosed this in a statement in Abuja.

    He said the deferment of resumption was to enable lawmakers, who are members of the All Progressives Congress (APC), to partake in the party’s membership registration and revalidation exercise scheduled to begin on Monday 25th January 2020.

    Details shortly….

    Read also: Tension in National Assembly for age falsification: workers under probe

  • Law scrapping pensions for Lagos ex-govs suffers delay

    Law scrapping pensions for Lagos ex-govs suffers delay

    The proposed law seeking to stop pensions and benefits for ex-governors has yet to be passed nearly two months after Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, announced plans to do so, motsho, says the bill seeking to scrap the Public Office Holder (Payment of Pension Law 2007), has been sent to the House of Assembly, multiple lawmakers who spoke to our correspondents stated the bill had not come up for mention and they were thus not aware of its existence.

    Sanwo-Olu had told the House while presenting the 2021 budget proposal on November 10, 2020, that he would send a bill to the House that will ensure that pensions for ex-governors are scrapped so as to reduce the cost of governance.

    READ ALSO: SERAP commends Sanwo-Olu over move to abolish pensions for former govs, deputies

    The House, however, passed the state budget last week and it was signed by Governor Sanwo-Olu on December 31, 2020.

    Speaking with one of our correspondents on Monday, a member of the House said there was no mention of the bill, adding that some provisions for the upkeep of some former political office holders were also included in the budget.

    “In the 2021 budget, there are some provisions for payment of some former officeholders. If for example, former Governor Ambode’s house is under construction, you wouldn’t expect it to stop halfway because of the new pension law. It seems the law will not take immediate effect even if it is passed today,” the lawmaker stated.

    READ ALSO:Military Pensions Board seeks increased budgetary allocation

    Another lawmaker who wished to remain anonymous said they had not seen the bill, adding that they would have passed it if it had been submitted because it didn’t require much legislative work.

    “To the best of my knowledge, we have not seen it. If he (Sanwo-Olu) had sent it to the House, it would have been given an express approval because it was an unjust law,” he stated.

  • Tension in National Assembly for age falsification: workers under probe

    Tension in National Assembly for age falsification: workers under probe

    The Nigeria Police Force has launched an investigation into a case of alleged criminal conspiracy and forgery against three top management staff members of the National Assembly.

    Our correspondent learnt that the three officials (names withheld) are currently holding key positions in the management hierarchy.

    They were said to have been invited twice by the Federal Capital Territory Police Command over alleged falsification of their dates of birth records, aimed at extending their retirement period.

    It was also learnt that the probe of the three officials followed a petition to the Clerk to the National Assembly and the Chairman of the National Assembly Service Commission by some workers.

    The parliamentary staff under the aegis of Concerned Staff of National Assembly who authored the petition, a copy of which was given to our correspondent, initially accused six officers of doctoring their ages in order to fraudulently extend their stay in service.

    Following the petition, the National Assembly reportedly caused an investigation into the background of officials, at the end of which three of the listed officers were indicted.

    The report of the investigation said the affected officers were found to have “discrepancies’ in their dates of birth.”

    According to the report, one of the affected officials was found to have three different dates of birth in his service record.

    It accused the official of changing his date of birth from October 6, 1961, to October 6, 1962 and later to October 9, 1963.

    Another senior worker involved in the age falsification scandal, according to the report, allegedly changed his date of birth from September 9, 1962, as contained in his personal file at the time of appointment, September 9, 1965 through a sworn affidavit in July 1999.

    Read also: Appeal Court reserves judgment in Bayelsa deputy gov certificate forgery suit

    The third senior official, the report added, allegedly falsified his date of birth which was April 14, 1962 to a new date of birth of April 14, 1964 as discovered in the nominal roll.

    It was gathered that the officials might be dismissed from the service of the National Assembly and could be prosecuted.

    However, one of the petitioners, who spoke with our correspondent on conditions of anonymity, said the management of the National Assembly could cover up the case because of the personality of those involved.

    When contacted, the Director of Information for the National Assembly management Rawlings Agada, said he was not aware of the case.

    He said, “The Commission are our employers, they keep documents and records of all staff. They deal with the issues of appointment, promotion and discipline. If such an issue arose, the affected officers would have been queried, and the commission would have obtained their responses.

    Read also: Court orders fresh arraignment of Ex AA National chairman, three others over forgery

    “It is the commission and the management that would release such officers for prosecution after a due process had been followed because all matters dealing with criminal actions are handled by security agencies.

    “I don’t think it is possible for anybody to hinder the police from carrying out their investigation.”

    Meanwhile, efforts made by our correspondent get necessary clarifications from the Public Relations Officer of the NASC, Emmanuel Anyigor, were futile on Sunday.

    Repeated calls made to his mobile phone were not answered and he had yet to reply to the text message sent to him.

    Read also: Court reinstates 32 Ekiti varsity Employees

  • Courtroom upholds INEC’s deregistration of AUN

    Courtroom upholds INEC’s deregistration of AUN

    The Federal Excessive Court docket in Abuja, on Wednesday, upheld the Impartial Nationwide Electoral Fee’s choice deregistering the Alliance for United Nigeria, as a political get together.

    Justice Ahmed Mohammed in a judgment held that INEC’s choice was “unassailable” because it was in keeping with the supply of part 225(a) of the Nigerian Structure.

    The choose held that the AUN failed to satisfy the statutory threshold of the registration requirement for political events.

    He held that having participated in the 2019 basic elections and didn’t win any seat in both federal, state, or native authorities ranges INEC was proper to deregister the social gathering as stipulated within the constitutional provision.

  • A Federal High Court in Lagos sentenced a cocaine importer to 10 years imprisonment.

    A Federal High Court in Lagos sentenced a cocaine importer to 10 years imprisonment.

    A Federal High Court in Lagos Thursday sentenced a cocaine importer,” Mr. Ejiofor Eliezer, to 10 years imprisonment.

    The sentence followed Eliezer’s conviction on a single count of unlawful importation of 2.155 kilogrammes of the illegal drug, filed by the National Drugs Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA).

    Justice Rilwan Aikawa, who handed down the ruling, said the prison term would begin running in the date Eliezer had been re-arrested after jumping bail.

    Asuquo stated Eliezer was detained on March 5, 2015, through an inaugural clearance of Arik Airline, in the Murtala Muhammad International Airport, Ikeja, Lagos, together with 2.155 kilogrammes of cocaine without any legal authority.

    The offence, Asuquo included, was contrary to and punishable under Section 11(a) of the National Drugs Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), 2004.

    Eliezer pleaded not guilty when he had been arraigned at 2015 and has been admitted to bail.

    However until the conclusion of the trial, he became evasive, and the court reversed his bond and announced him desired. Eliezer was later rearrested and remanded in Nigerian Correctional Services (NCOS) custody.

    The fee on which Eliezer was detained: “You Ejiofor Eliezer, Male, Mature on roughly 5th day of March 2015, throughout the Inward Clearance of Arik Airline in the Murtala Mohammed International Airport, Ikeja Lagos, over the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court. Imported 2.155 Kilograms of Cocaine without legal authority and thus committed an offense against and punishable under Section 11(a) of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agencies Act Cap N3O, Law of the Federation of Nigeria.”

  • Lagos to pass Charge for Property Law

    Lagos to pass Charge for Property Law

    Lagos to pass Charge for Property Law

    The invoice entitled Lagos State Real Estate Regulatory Authority’ went via public hearing Thursday in the meeting pavilion.

    The Chairman, Committee on Housing, Bisi Yusuff, addressing specialists from the industry, noted that it was necessary for the meeting to choose the problem confronting the actual estate severely through mandatory legislation.

    He explained the bill was aimed at assessing the excesses of operators from the business and reducing quackery from the industry.

    He added that property was an important business that hadn’t been adequately controlled and controlled in Nigeria, notably Lagos State.

    Read also: IGP orders use of lawful force to protect lives, property

    The Majority Leader of this House, Sanai Agunbiade, stated the bill was split into 37 segments, including that the regulatory authority could be led by a chairman,” who will be an individual of repute and an expert in his field of practice with less than 15 decades of cognate experience.”

    Some estate operators nevertheless expressed worry over the proposed bill and complained that it didn’t provide for parallel law of their formal and informal sectors of property.

    A member of this Association of Estate Agents in Nigeria, Bolaji Raymond, stated that the bill failed to provide for parallel law of those folks in formal and informal sectors of property.

    He added that there was no penalty for not fulfilling the requirements for enrollment, stressing the sole mentioned penalty was for people who had initially enrolled.

    Raymond stated, “Section 27 of this bill talks about qualified applicants, who didn’t enroll. The majority of the folks on the roads aren’t enrolled and what they perform isn’t criminalized or penalized at the invoice.

    “With Section 16, we’re encouraging what we’re operating away from as a person doesn’t have to enroll with the CAC based on this invoice.”

    Read also: President Muhammadu Buhari, Monday in Abuja cautioned that any action of hooliganism hiding behind lawful and peaceful protests will be dealt with decisively to guarantee stability and peace in the nation.

    The Nigerian Institution of Estate Surveyors and Valuer’s initial Vice President, Johnbull Amayaevbo, stated that there were many regions of the bill that had to be addressed and indicated that the state authorities identified the vital professionals to have a look at the bill.

    “I’m rather certain the intention of this bill will nevertheless be fulfilled if the state authorities collaborate with those in the profession, which is in the constructed environment,” he explained.

    Additionally speaking, yet another member of this AEAN, Ayobayo Babade, advised that young people ought to be invited and forced members of their board.

    Responding, Eshinlokun-Sanni claimed the dilemma of the composition of this board could be considered, including that each of the matters raised by the stakeholders could be given consideration at the bill.

    Read also: End SARS: Nigerians who caused damage to property must be punished – Amaechi

  • Court reinstates 32 Ekiti varsity Employees

    Court reinstates 32 Ekiti varsity Employees

    Court reinstates 32 Ekiti varsity Employees
    The direction December 5, 2019, disengaged over 900 of its workforce for alleged certification forgery, irregular appointment, overage, along with other allegations which contravened its terms of support.

    In a lawsuit, 32 technologists of the researchers dragged EKSU, EKSU Governing Council, also EKSU Vice-Chancellor (first to third party defendants) into the Industrial Court to seek treatment.

    They requested the court to find out whether their employment using EKSU loved statutory defense and if their disengagement was compatible with their status of occupation, which appreciated the statute.

    Amongst others, they sought a declaration of this court their disengagement as employees of EKSU” from the way that it was done was criminal, irregular, illegal and so null and void and of no effect.

    Read also: Court acquits Wali, Ahmad of N950 million money laundering charges

    “An arrangement for its restoration and reinstatement of their claimants for their own offices without reduction of wages, promotions, emoluments, and other allowances for these as employees of their initial respondent (EKSU).

    “Payment of the claimants’ three months wages, emoluments, and other allowances owed them ahead of the purported and criminal disengagement.”

    But counselor to the college prayed the court to not grant the petition of their 32 technologists, stating they’d been able to establish from the case which their appointments with EKSU were unlawfully determined.

    After listening to this entry of the claimants’ and defence’s adviser, the presiding judge, Justice K. D. Damulak, announced the judgment of the employees’ appointment as”unlawful, null and void.”

    Read also: Just In: Wike imposes 24 hours curfew on parts of P-Harcourt, warns youths against cultism

  • Court rules on Lawsuit against Imo govt from 27 LGA chairmen

    Court rules on Lawsuit against Imo govt from 27 LGA chairmen

    Court rules on Lawsuit against Imo govt by 27 LGA chairmen

    A High Court in Imo State, on Friday, announced the election of the 27 Local Government Area chairmen ran by ex-governor, Rochas Okorocha about the 25th day of August 2018 as null and void and of no effect at all.

    Justice E.F Njemanze while providing judgement in the matter between Innocent Nmezi and others against the Imo State government ordered all the former 27 LGA chairmen to come back to the state authorities all salaries and allowances paid to them until they were dissolved.

    Read also: JUST IN: Imo lawmaker dumps APC for PDP

    The judge ruled that they occupied those places illegally since their elections were conducted against the extant electoral legislation of Imo State.

    Aggrieved by the elections, Innocent Nmezi and others had brought an action from the State Government, the Imo State Independent Electoral Commission (IMSIEC) and the 27 Local Government Chairmen purportedly elected by the past State Government under Owelle Rochas Okorocha, currently the Senator representing Orlu zone at the red chamber.